HAMAS WINS BIG!
***
Jolly Uncle Jihad John W. Willmott
Brings you the truth!
***
Subject: Hamas Respond, But Will They Deliver
Salahuddin Al-Ayubi?
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:34:30 +0000
From: lists@tajdeedmail.net
To: tiojuan1@earthlink.net
In the Name of Allah, Most Beneficent, Most Merciful
Hamas Respond, But Will They Deliver Salahuddin
Yamin Zakaria http://www.iiop.org yaminz@yahoo.co.uk
- 27/01/2006 - London, UK
Jimmy Carter, the former US president, leading
a team of 900 foreign observes said, the elections in the West Bank and
Gaza Strip were "completely honest". Definitely honest, compared to the
standards set by the US, when George Bush ‘won’ the Florida 2000 election
by denying the blacks (Afro-Americans) and all the other coloured folks
a vote, as they were poised to vote for the democrats. It must have brought
pleasant memories back of the good old days, when the likes of Bush could
literally chain and lynch those black folks;
never mind vote, they would be lucky, if they could breath.
The turnout was 78 percent of 1.3 million voters,
greater than most of the ‘democracies’ in the West, where the election
results are known even before the election. Such ‘elections’ are determined
by money, and not the votes: and if this is democracy then we need to redefine
what constitutes oligarchy! It was amusing to see the responses of the
Western leaders; some of them could be described as idiotic even if I was
to be kind! Anyway, I have taken the liberty to respond to those
comments on behalf of Hamas. If my answers are
at odds with the Party position, I hope they will correct me.
Italy: "It is a very, very, very bad result,"
(Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister.)
Hamas: Oh, Why is that? I thought you were in
favour of free and fair election, a pillar of democracy we keep hearing.
Perhaps you prefer the mafia style oligarchy instead. Or may be you want
our leaders to invest in porn and crime syndicates. When you clarify your
commitment to democracy, you know the type of democracy, which is not rigged
by money and ‘influence’, perhaps then we can understand why you thought
the result was a bad one. We did our best to play by the rules of your
game but it seems somehow we have misunderstood the rules!
United Kingdom: “But I think it is also important
for Hamas to understand that there comes a point, and that point is now
following that strong showing, where they have to decide between a path
of democracy or a path of violence." (Tony Blair, the British prime minister)
Hamas: Mr Blair, if you oppose violence, what
is your army doing in Iraq. Why have you invaded a country, killing between
30,000-100,000 innocent civilians, who have done no harm to your people?
Is that not a clear example of unprovoked violence? Yes, a bit like your
football hooligans, just ask Nick Griffin, he might give you a guided tour.
If violence and democracy are mutually exclusive, then why do you not lead
by example; disband your nuclear weapons, stop making huge profit from
the sale of arms to dictators around the world. Why do you not call for
the total nuclear disarmament and instead of just selectively targeting
Iran, they have yet to produce anything nuclear.
Before you lecture us about violence, at least
do the decent thing and get the facts, I know that can sometime hurt your
conscience - that is if you have one. Tell us how many Palestinians and
Israeli Jews have perished since 1948 or 1924. Who have been the bigger
victims numerically? They are not the perpetrators but the real victim
of state-terrorism. Did you
know that many Jews from your country serve in
the Israeli army, helping the ethnic cleansing process that began in 1948?
Of course by wearing an Israeli army uniform that makes it civilised, but
if the Muslims from Britain help the Palestinians that makes them terrorists.
A bit like your UN, a Veto for you but none for us! If you do not believe
me about the ethnic-cleansing process, which began in 1948, please take
a look at the map of Palestine from 1946 till today.
USA: "I don't see how you (Hamas) can be a partner
in peace if you advocate the destruction of a country (Israel) as part
of your platform." (George Bush, the US President.)
Hamas: Absolutely correct Mr Bush, how can you
be partner if you are destroying a legitimate country. That is exactly
what the Iraqis are asking now. In fact how can you even talk of peace,
as your armed forces have destroyed a country, a country that has never
attacked your people? Do you not feel any shame in even uttering words
like “peace”? Perhaps you no longer understand what shame is, like many
of your soldiers demonstrated in Abu-Ghraib, as many do regularly on Jerry
Springer.
We would urge you to look at the facts. Please
have a look at the map, it shows clearly who has been diminishing and who
has been expanding since 1948. I refer to a map, as you have demonstrated
numerous times you have a very poor grasp of history and geography. I know
it might shock many of your citizens; some would dismiss the map as propaganda,
as many think Palestinians invaded Israel in 1948. How many Palestinians
houses destroyed compared to how many Jewish
settlement are built everyday. You advocate a
law where the Palestinians disposed from their homes in 1948 cannot return
but any Jew can come and settle in that land, because the Bible says so.
Now we as Muslims must abide by your religious verdict, yet all this time
we thought you were against mixing religion and politics.
amas is not opposed to the existence of the State
of Israel; we have no objection to its existence as long as it is not in
Palestine. In fact, if you are so committed to a Jewish state, then why
do you not lead by example? Remember deeds speak louder than words. You
have a continent to play with. Give them Alaska, or New York. We and the
rest of the Islamic world will give you more than 100% cooperation. By
the way, while you are at it, please take with you all the other puppets
you have imposed on the Islamic world. As for opposing the existence of
Israel in Palestine, this is the opinion of the 1.5 billion Muslims and
those who want a compromise, only because they are pragmatic not because
they believe it to be a just olution.
USA: "You cannot have one foot in politics and
another in terror"… that for the US, Hamas was still a terrorist organisation.
(Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State).
Hamas: Hamas condemns terrorism, especially the
larger state terrorism of the US, UK and Israel. We condemn the terrorism
in Iraq, its people terrorised under “shock and awe”, so that it can provide
cheap entertainment for your people. Yet, how proud you Americans feel
calling others violent, but this is what happens when one becomes immune
from
shame and arrogance. All we say, we have
the right to defend and retaliate. If that means we are terrorists, then
let the world know that we are indeed proud terrorists, as Sheikh Osama
Bin Laden said clearly.
I am afraid Hamas could never match the terror
of your firepower and your war machine that has consumed 30,000-100,000
civilians. We favour renouncing violence as the Palestinians are the ones
who are terrorised, by the weapons that your government supplies to Israel.
So that the ‘chosen’ people of God can have their way at any cost and some
would classify that as a Nazi like ideology. Hamas will lay down their
weapons when the Israelis lay down their weapons and return our lands and
homes. Moreover, Hamas will support the right of the Jews to be compensated
for the hundreds of years of persecution faced in Europe.
Final Remark
Why do you not admit that you do not favour genuine
democracy but a government that will be subservient to your interests?
It would stop all the arguments and debates. Remember when FIS (Islamic
Salvation Front) was poised to win a fair election, the Algerian government
postponed it. Similarly the Turkish army constrained the Islamic party
led by Necmettin Erbakan, after it won the election. No cry for democracy
than, which had to wait until 2003, when the US launched its war on terror
(Islam), so building democracy became a good pretext.
This is not the first time the Western leaders
has been exposed for their arrogance by arrogating themselves to speak
for the Muslims, when they do not even represent their own population.
Indeed, it was amusing to think how much agony the right-wing commentators
must be in, like Jim Carey, in the film “Liar Liar” - they cannot utter
“free and fair election”
for the next 24 hours. Let us hope, those obnoxious
characters disguised as journalists will stop knocking on our doors with
slogans of democracy and freedom. May be now they realise that election
like technology is only a means to achieve something, no civilisation has
a complete monopoly on those things.
The party that has won has given its blood to
its people and for the Muslims Ummah (Community). Was it not our children
with rocks and stones have been defending Al-Aqsa, while the Muslim armies
sit in their barracks and our so-called leaders commit hideous acts of
treachery after treachery. By our blood and by our soul we will continue
to sacrifice, until the return of Salahuddin Al-Ayubi with his army, and
regain our peace and security; the land of olives (Bilad Az-Zaytun) will
once again become green from red. We urge the rest of the Muslims Ummah
to help us to hasten the return of Salahuddin Al-Ayubi and as a first step
replicate our humble example in their respective lands.
Copyright © 2006 by Yamin Zakaria As-Salamu
Alaykum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh,
The following information is a reminder
of your current mailing list subscription: You are subscribed to the following
list: Party for Islamic Renewal, using the following email: tiojuan1@earthlink.net.You
may automatically unsubscribe from this
list at any time by visiting the following
URL: http://217.174.248.114/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/u/pir/
If the above URL is inoperable, make sure
that you have copied the entire address. Some mail readers will wrap
a long URL and thus break this automatic unsubscribe mechanism. You
may also change your subscription by visiting this list's main screen:
http://217.174.248.114/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/list/pir
If you're still having trouble, please
contact the list owner at the following physical address:
B M Box: TAJDEED, London, WC1N 3XX,
United Kingdom, Website: http://www.tajdeed.net
Email: lists@tajdeedmail.net
